5.A) Park City Mountain Resort Base Parking Lots - MPD Modification Work Session- Replace Expired Exhibit D of the DA, the 1998 PCMR Base Area Master Plan Study Concept Master Plan, With a New Master Plan, Known as the Park City Base Area Lot Redevelopment Master Plan Study. The Commission Will Discuss the Applicant's Off-Site Parking and Transportation Mitigation Proposal. PL-20-04475. *Public Input will be taken via e-comments and Zoom* (A) Work Session, No Action Will Be Taken
PCMC paid for “Transit Analysis of PCMR from the (future) Quinn’s Junction Park and Ride. As a taxpayer in Park City, I expect an accurate foundation as a basis for findings. This is what I expect for the money …
First: The study must record the existing conditions by collecting real time data from current and recent ski seasons. Simply, the data is … days and times the parking lots are filled to capacity.
Second: The day-to-day parking needs based on the real data is determined, which establishes a base line for parking and transit needs from Quinn’s Junction.
Third: Customize the proposed transit revolutions accordingly and effectively in designated bus lanes with built-in flexibility to accommodate weather, skier use variability, and public use.
Sixth: Determine the real cost. It is crucial. PEG/Vail must pay their fair share.
Factors to consider:
How much money will PEG save by not building the required underground parking? Their windfall should not be our loss. Directly apply their gain to the Quinn’s parking lot and transit. Plan for future increases in transit and road maintenance costs. The PEG/Vail share should not be fixed but revisited periodically.
Back to the first step, collecting data on parking lot capacity per day during the current ski season is not complicated. It does require time and attention to detail. The data is available. Local residents have recorded lot capacity per day. For your information, the real data indicates a gross miscalculation of transit needs in the above analysis. Thus, the PEG/Vail share is unresolved.
Thank you, Commissioners, for your time,
Sherie C. Harding
PCMC paid for “Transit Analysis of PCMR from the (future) Quinn’s Junction Park and Ride. As a taxpayer in Park City, I expect an accurate foundation as a basis for findings. This is what I expect for the money …
First: The study must record the existing conditions by collecting real time data from current and recent ski seasons. Simply, the data is … days and times the parking lots are filled to capacity.
Second: The day-to-day parking needs based on the real data is determined, which establishes a base line for parking and transit needs from Quinn’s Junction.
Third: Customize the proposed transit revolutions accordingly and effectively in designated bus lanes with built-in flexibility to accommodate weather, skier use variability, and public use.
Sixth: Determine the real cost. It is crucial. PEG/Vail must pay their fair share.
Factors to consider:
How much money will PEG save by not building the required underground parking? Their windfall should not be our loss. Directly apply their gain to the Quinn’s parking lot and transit. Plan for future increases in transit and road maintenance costs. The PEG/Vail share should not be fixed but revisited periodically.
Back to the first step, collecting data on parking lot capacity per day during the current ski season is not complicated. It does require time and attention to detail. The data is available. Local residents have recorded lot capacity per day. For your information, the real data indicates a gross miscalculation of transit needs in the above analysis. Thus, the PEG/Vail share is unresolved.
Thank you, Commissioners, for your time,
Sherie C. Harding